ARD Price Target FY07: TBA
ARD EPS Estimate FY07: TBA

Tuesday, February 20, 2007

Why my ARD Share Count was Reduced 26% Today
Various Reasons Contributed to Decision; Diversification and More Attractive Investment Opportunity Played Key Role to Sell

Arena Resources' ratio of capex to cashflow from operating activities, EPS per dollar invested and the likely decline in future production growth were three primary factors that contributed to my decision to sell over a quarter of my ARD shares today. Such a sale never would have occurred in the absence of another more attractive investment opportunity.

The other company I moved the proceeds into was just far too undervalued based on the tremendous earnings power per dollar invested (topping that of ARD), cashflow from operating activities in excess of capex by a significant margin (unlike ARD) and production growth that is more secure without the great challenges of the natural declines that occur in mature oil fields such as the Fuhrman-Mascho.

The new company I invested in does not produce oil. It produces a commodity that has the same worldwide supply/demand issues that exist with that of oil. The peak oil problem will have the effect of increasing future demand for this non hydrocarbon as governments seek solutions to rising oil prices by investing in alternative fuels such as ethanol (stainless steel requirements) and hybrid vehicles (nicad batteries.) Both stainless steel and nicad batteries are only two of countless applications that consume a commodity the new company produces.


One should not construe my portfolio rebalancing as a result of glaring red flags at ARD. The more proper assessment would be that the other opportunity currently presents a more significant discount to intrinsic value than does ARD.

Going forward I do have certain expectations for ARD. Failure to meet or exceed my expectations would result in the possibility of future ARD liquidation. The expectations are as follows:

1. Oil in Kansas: The absence of commercial oil production associated with the deep test on the Syracuse in light of the Phil Terry promotion to COO at a salary of $160,000 a year would be a red flag. Only in the presence of oil in Kansas should Phil Terry have been hired. Lack of oil in Kansas noted in FY06 C.C. would yield a red flag.

2. EPS coming in at or Above $0.36: An EPS disappointment below my conservative estimate of $0.36 would yield another red flag. This would be a sign of a cost structure that is rising faster than expected.

3. Proved Reserve Growth of at Least 40.2%: Anything less than a 40.2% increase in year end proved reserves to 42,362,535 BOE for FY2006 would be considered a disappointment. This would constitute another possible red flag.

Even in the absence of potential red flags as mentioned above, a sound business decision could mandate the further decrease of ARD ownership and increase the ownership of the new company.
The new company I have moved funds into as mentioned above is a producer of the base metal nickel. Here is the price history of the commodity. This company comprises the second company in my portfolio. After the release of ARD Q4'06 results this company will be revealed.

Wednesday, February 07, 2007

ARD CEO Tim Rochford Sells 200,000 Common Shares
Two Day Transaction Size is Record for CEO; Represents First Time CEO has Sold Shares Prior to Release of Reserve Report

The CEO share sale on February 1-2 may seem bearish at first glance due to the number of shares sold. After all, this is the largest block of shares that he has sold in a two day span going back to the birth of the company in 2001. In fact, this is the largest share sale by the CEO in any 30 day span. In 2006 Rochford sold 140,000 shares in a period between September 18 and October 4th. However, one needs to understand that the timing of the share sale is extremely bullish.

Timing of Share Sale is Bullish

This is the first time in the history of the company that CEO Tim Rochford has sold shares prior to the Reserve Report announcement. This is also the first time that Tim has sold shares prior to the release of the operational results of the fourth quarter and full year. Certainly Tim would be subjecting himself to a potential SEC investigation if he sold his shares with either a disappointing reserves report or operational results.

We already know operationally the company produced approximately 325,000 BOE in Q4'06. This is below guidance. However, there were valid reasons for the shortfall in production which will ultimately be reflected in the fourth quarter revenues, net income and EPS. One should expect good news as it relates to the year-end reserve report. Expect at least a 40.2% increase in proved reserves over the previous year.

One should also expect to hear good news as it relates to the Syracuse Project in southwest Kansas with the joint venture partner. Specifically don't be surprised if Tim announces the presence of commercial oil production on this project in association with the St.Louis formation. Expect the partnership to reveal initial development plans. This increased activity in Kansas and the likely presence of oil bearing hydrocarbons fits perfectly with Tim's decision to give the day to day operational control to the newly appointed President and Chief Operating Officer, Phil Terry. The creation of this $160,000 a year position is further proof of the likelihood oil has been found in Kansas. This amount is more than the combined salaries of CEO Rochford, Chairman McCabe and CFO Broaddrick in 2006. Tim is a low cost man. He couldn't justify creating a new $160,000 upper level management position in the absence of significant growth going forward.

Below is a chart indicating ARD CEO Tim Rochford's common stock sales by year. The chart below tells the story of Tim's investment in Arena. The first four years of the company's existence he did not sell a single share nor profit from his investment of time and money. This is especially true given the fact that his annual salary has been no greater than $36,000 a year. Only since 2005 has ARD CEO Tim Rochford finally realized some return on his investment by virtue of his sales of common stock.


The chart below indicates that Tim's holdings are declining over time. The sales of common stock are partially being offset by increases in stock options. The picture below indicates that Tim has not decreased his position significantly in ARD shares and stock options when taken in aggregate. Certainly stock options are comprising a larger percentage of Tim's ARD portfolio.



In summary, Tim is finally beginning to see some return on his investment in Arena Resources. The size of the latest common stock sales should not be viewed as bearish. Instead the timing of these share sales should be clear indication of good things to come. His ownership in the company has not decreased significantly even with the common stock sales as a result of stock option awards. Additionally the appointment of Phil Terry as the new President and Chief Operating Officer at a salary of $160,000 a year is further proof of significant drilling opportunities not only in the Permian Basin but also as they relate to the very probable presence of oil bearing hydrocarbons in the Syracuse Project's St.Louis Formation.

Monday, February 05, 2007

Michael Savage Considers Presidental Bid
Nation's Third Most Listened to Talk Show Host Mulls Run as GOP Candidate

Click here for the full story.

WEB POLL:
Should Michael Savage run for President of the United States?
YES/NO

Saturday, February 03, 2007

What will GMXR earn in Q4'06?

GMXR should have Q4'06 EPS of $0.13 fully diluted. GMXR earned $0.33 in the year ago period. With the current ttm EPS at $0.88 (according to Yahoo Finance) the $0.20 drop will result in ttm EPS of $0.68. The ttm P/E will balloon to 52 based on Friday's closing price of $35.41. The forward P/E remains over 24 based on Wallstreet consensus of $1.43. The shares are currently overvalued by a significant margin based on fundamentals.

Friday, February 02, 2007

Why GMXR CFO Ken Kenworthy Sr. should either resign or be terminated
CFO Kenworthy consistently violates the company 'Code of Business Conduct and Ethics.'

GMXR has a 'Code of Business Conduct and Ethics' published on their company website. There are 14 points discussed in this 'Code.' What rules has he broken?

1. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS
"It is the policy of the Company to comply with all laws wherever it does business."


GMXR CEO Fails to Certify 2005 10K as Required by SEC. Company Forced to Amend 10K. The CFO of GMXR (Ken Kenworthy Sr.) signed section 1350 on the 2005 10K reserved for the CEO; Effectively this made the document non compliant with SEC rules and regulations (laws) as the the SEC requires the CEO to sign the CEO certification (Not the CFO.)

See Photo of CFO signature on CEO certification section

2. RECORD KEEPING
"All Company accounting records and reports produced from those records shall be kept and presented accurately and in accordance with generally accepted accounting practices..."


GMXR CFO consistently puts out inaccurate information. Look at the latest press releases. There is absolutely no excuse for the amount of errors and magnitude of the errors that occurred with two separate press releases within the last week. The
first error ridden press release was released on January 25, 2007. Not only was this press release full of errors but the headline in the press release was not grammatically correct and was very poorly worded. Compare the actual headline with another persons idea of how the headline should have been written.

Two days later on January 27, 2007 another press release was issued correcting the multiple errors in the initial press release from two days prior.

Here is
one person's take on the errors confessed on January 27, 2007.

Four days later on January 31, 2007
GMXR issued the third public statement in 7 days either containing errors or confessing to them.

Error from January 31, 2007:
* "On January 31, 2007, the management of GMX Resources Inc. (the "Company") determined that its pro forma footnote disclosures for stock based compensation expense...were overstated and therefore not correct."

* "financial statements relating to the 2005 Interim Periods should no longer be relied upon."

3. PUBLIC DISCLOSURES
"We must assure that all disclosures... submitted to, the Securities and Exchange Commission...by the Company are...accurate (and) timely."


GMXR has consistently had problems submitting required SEC filings in a timely fashion:

* GMX RESOURCES INC NT 10-K 3/30/2004; 12/31/2003
PART III - NARRATIVE: The Company was unable to timely complete its audited financial statements for its Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003, because of a lack of personnel and a delay in the receipt of the oil and gas reserve report by the Company.

* GMX RESOURCES INC NT 10-K 4/1/2003; 12/31/2002
PART III - NARRATIVE: The registrant was unable to timely complete its Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2002 because of reductions in accounting personnel due to working capital limitations.

* GMX RESOURCES INC NT 10-K 4/2/2002; 12/31/2001
PART III - NARRATIVE: The registrant was unable to timely complete its Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2001 because of a delay in receiving its reserve report from third parties necessary to complete the audited financial statements and other disclosures.

* GMX RESOURCES INC NT 10-Q 5/14/2003; 3/31/2003
PART III - NARRATIVE: The registrant was unable to timely complete its Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 because of reductions in accounting personnel due to working capital limitations.

* GMX RESOURCES INC NT 10-Q 5/15/2002; 3/31/2002
PART III - NARRATIVE: The Company was unable to prepare financial statements in sufficient time to permit required review by its auditors.

* GMX RESOURCES INC NT 10-Q 11/15/2001; 9/30/2001
PART III - NARRATIVE: The registrant was unable to timely complete its Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2001 because of its inability to obtain some of the required financial information from third parties.

4. CONFLICT OF INTEREST:
"Conflicts of interest are prohibited as a matter of Company policy. A 'conflict of interest' exists when a person’s private interest interferes in any material way with the interests of the Company."

GMXR CFO Ken Kenworthy Sr. is the father of GMXR CEO Ken Kenworthy Jr. The frequency, magnitude and kinds of errors committed by CFO Ken Kenworthy Sr. are completely unacceptable for a CFO. Due to the family relationship of these two individuals, the son (the CEO) is not able to discipline the CFO (the father) with an unpaid suspension or termination. Clearly this is a conflict of interest and is in violation of the GMXR published 'Code.'


IN conclusion, CFO Ken Kenworthy Sr. should be terminated or at the very least disciplined (unpaid suspension?) The corporate governance clearly states:

"ACCOUNTABILITY:
Violations of the Code are cause for disciplinary action, which may result in disciplinary action up to and including discharge."

Ken Kenworthy Sr: You are not worthy.

Thursday, February 01, 2007

Matthew Simmons Mentions $300 Oil in Today's Bloomberg Interview

Watch Video